Why Does the British Empire Fear China's Belt and Road Initiative

Why Does the British Empire Fear China's Belt and Road Initiative
5,473 views

96

4

SHARE



Schiller Institute
Published on Oct 26, 2017
SUBSCRIBE 3K
 SUBSCRIBE SUBSCRIBED UNSUBSCRIBE
As China, under Xi Jinping's leadership, is moving ahead with plans for the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to realize the dream of global economic cooperation, as the basis for peace, the City of London/Wall Street-controlled media has become more dishonest and vicious than ever.  In the last days, the {Wall Street Journal}, {Time} magazine and London's flagship, {Economist}, have added their voices to the chorus of shrieks attacking China. 

While incompetently insisting that China's policy is creating an unsustainable debt bubble -- ignoring the REAL debt bubble set to explode in the Trans-Atlantic region -- the defenders of the bankrupt geopolitical empire accuse China of using infrastructure development to enslave poor nations, by loading them up with debt and stealing their raw materials (which is, of course, what the British Empire has done for centuries).

So why the panic?  With President Trump set for what could become a world-historic series of meetings in Asia, the possibility that the U.S. will become a participant in the BRI would be a major step toward putting an end to the unipolar world enforced by the collapsing banking and financial empire.

Join the Schiller Institute's weekly webcast this Thursday, to get the real news of this dynamic process, and become a participant in this world historic transformation.
SHOW MORE
50 Comments
SORT BY
 Auggie Giuseppe
Add a public comment...
paradoxman316
paradoxman316
2 weeks ago
It's not Britain, it's the Rothschild scammers/international bankers that don't want their empire to collapse.
REPLY
14



Marhaba Mustafa
Marhaba Mustafa
1 week ago
Great discussion👍
REPLY
1



thndrngest
thndrngest
3 weeks ago
Madam, your words are so on-point & incredibly forward-looking, way above the so-called pundits in the subject of China.
REPLY
10



Colin Tan
Colin Tan
2 weeks ago (edited)
British Imperialism is based on old fashioned White Man's burden to grab resources in one's interests and not, the WinWin formula as in the new BRI concept of the 2 ways transfer of  Capitals, Resources and Technology in the interests of both parties.
REPLY
14



View all 11 replies
 Colin Tan
Colin Tan
2 weeks ago (edited)
Xi is the  Father of the ground breaking futuristic concept of Shared common destiny of Mankind.
REPLY
15



chikum chills Jr.
chikum chills Jr.
3 weeks ago
Thank you for the update. You guys are doing great job
REPLY
13



J S.
J S.
2 weeks ago
It's very important to tie Pakistan-Iran-Turkey and lots middle Asian countries together with the OBOR project. These countries share many similar cultures/ancestries etc and are much easier to work together.
REPLY
8



View reply
 David Stanley
David Stanley
2 weeks ago
We need a maglev high speed train system from Washington to Calgary to Alaska Moscow, Beijing HUB # 1 To bring together  Humanity.
REPLY
6



View reply
 uuubeut
uuubeut
3 weeks ago
anglo-american zionism is the system behind the NWO ..
REPLY
4



Johnny Lim
Johnny Lim
1 week ago
Great talk, I agree with you.
REPLY
2



Y Qisq
Y Qisq
6 days ago
Too bad, all what the brainless mainstream media know is to yell "China has become more authoritarian under Xi"! People need to pay more attention to the actually important details like those being discussed in this video.
REPLY
3



Colin Tan
Colin Tan
4 days ago
The greatest contribution of Xi's is not the BRI infrastructural-economic plan for the coming decades and centuries and which is now  greatly feared by the Anglo powers,   but the viral speed in  spreading   his breakthrough idea of replacing the  "Traditional geopolitics in foreign countries" as practiced by Imperialist great powers from the eighteen century onward in their interests  with his idea of "Common shared destiny for Mankind"   where all of mankind can lifted out of poverty through WinWin investments of infrastructures, spread of technology, urbanisation etc.
Read more
REPLY
2



yliang1688
yliang1688
3 days ago
Well said and very impressive.   Thanks.
REPLY



Ai
Ai
4 days ago
Very insightful. Thank you.
REPLY



lord fec16
lord fec16
1 week ago
der its #cityoflondon not britain england or uk
REPLY



Sunny Fung
Sunny Fung
1 week ago
Thank you for bringing a balance viewpoint
REPLY



nishant saha
nishant saha
2 weeks ago
This is just neo colonialism. This whole BRI stinks of that.
REPLY



View reply
 MrDuncmck
MrDuncmck
3 weeks ago (edited)
over a long period of time people and cultures adapt to an authoritarian society run by the .0001 % .how can you know peoples hearts? there have been a few times out of thousands where there was benevolent dictator -ships so to speak..what is the probability? mao tsa i tung was a butcher of 10s of millions..stalin,, pol pot ..look at north korea ? is human suffering all just contrived  propaganda? and it never really happened? is history all been fake and fine tuned out of reality? is this really just another point of view? ideologue?so are we saying we(USA) are not the world police ..but?? our culture is based upon (inalienable rights of the INDIVIDUAL) how does that work? maybe it can? natural resources and power addiction always seems to get in the way.helga is brilliant .i read much of her perspective.so is lyndon.i am on board but i have profound questions .what is consciousness and society? top down? i have a problem if it is ruled that way..free will is not an illusory epiphinomina.i get that power junkies come in many forms..corp/oligarch/british imperialism/ religious fanatics/institution by themselves declare the right to herd their human cattle with impunity. communism has been by far the most brutal and direct human cattle rustlers.
Read more
REPLY



View all 7 replies
 drgmbhatia
drgmbhatia
3 weeks ago
Remember, Sir Halford Mackinder warning in 1904 in his famous ‘The Geographical Pivot of History’ thesis that no rogue (Communist) country should be allowed to control “Geographic Pivot” with Indian oceanic access as that would bring “the yellow peril to the world’s freedom.” By  getting access to Indian ocean by colonizing a debt-ridden Pakistan and acquiring  control over Central Asian states (Mackinder’s Geographic Pivot) after reducing Russian hold through BRI, China wants to become Super Power by Machiavellian games.  Chinese Commies must not  get access to Indian ocean which would accentuate their rogue behavior after what  they have done in east & south China sea and Doklam, and by clandestinely nuke-missile arming of rogue nations like N. Korea which  threatens the US & Pakistan which has sent terrorists into the world. 

President Trump’s  threat of  trade-ban on China for doing business with N. Korea brought mortal fears into China which accumulates its dollar reserves mainly by trade-surpluses from the US & India. It needs India’s vast 600 million strong consumers' market to offset fallout of trade-war with the US. But China's dirty designs have been blocked by India's refusal to join CPEC as that becomes less viable without access to India’s vast consumer market. Moreover, PM Modi's "make in India" program induces global companies to shift manufacturing out of rogue China taking instant advantage of India's vast market. CPEC is destined to fail & Chabahar is better placed as it has road links to peaceful area of Iran, Afghanistan & Central Asia.  CPEC passes through part of Kashmir & Balochistan- both  illegally occupied by Pakistan and  unfortunate people from these  regions need to be liberated from cruel Paki yoke.
Read more
REPLY



View all 15 replies
 Yannick Caroff
Yannick Caroff
3 weeks ago
thanks again ! i just read yesterday  an article by Balladur (ancient prime minister in France, pro-EU) and others in Liberation newspaper in which they discuss means by its they can prevent "mny cheminade candidates for the next presidential campaigns" in France. Is it necessary to mention that Cheminade is a friend of Lyndon and Helga Larouche and was the only candidate in 2017 who defended the new silk road paradigm ? no comments...
Read more
REPLY