Judge Challenges Prosecutor's Statement over Meng Wanzhou's Extradition ...

\\\ CA 3 CCTV is funded in whole or in part by the Chinese government. Wikipedia Judge Challenges Prosecutor's Statement over Meng Wanzhou's Extradition Case 8,695 views Aug 13, 2021 302 6 Share Save CCTV Video News Agency 413K subscribers The judge presiding over the formal extradition hearing for Huawei Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou on Thursday appeared skeptical of the arguments put forward by prosecutors representing the Canadian and U.S. governments. https://www.cctvplus.com/news/2021081... Welcome to subscribe us on: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/NewsContent.... Twitter: https://twitter.com/CCTV_Plus LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cctv... Video on Demand: www.cctvplus.com If you are in demand of this video footage, please contact with our business development team via email: service@cctvplus.com 135 Comments Auggie Giuseppe Add a public comment... Sae Hian Lim Sae Hian Lim 4 hours ago (edited) So call freedom of speech, human rights, and bullshit laws that abuse human rights and rights to speech of Canada. 45 Ice phoenix Ice phoenix 3 hours ago I'm Asian American and I support China!!!! 22 Ang Xiang Ang Xiang 4 hours ago Only as the future unfolds, can we know if Canada is truly independent and rule freely from US domination. 43 Freddy Ho Freddy Ho 3 hours ago Its funny how some part of the emails from HSBC can be used against Meng, whereas down the line of the email trails which shows HSBC is aware of therefore proving Meng's innocence CANNOT be used in trial. 21 Torbjørn Melbye Torbjørn Melbye 4 hours ago Canadas law system will never be trusted if they do not release Meng Wanzhou 64 Gary Ong Gary Ong 3 hours ago They are squirming in their seats and now trying to tell the judge what she can and can't do. She (the judge) should send them packing back to the US from whence they came. What impertinence, what a bloody cheek scallywag! 10 RJ D RJ D 4 hours ago Justice bases on a lie is not justice Free Meng now! 41 Blake Newton Blake Newton 2 hours ago In this case the Prosecutor is wrong. The judge can use the information gathered as evidence of knowledge. It's obvious that HSBC knew of the links between Huawei and Skycom. And now it's obvious that the judge said most people know. I find it surprising that a bank wouldn't have a collective awareness of the corporate structure of its 17th largest customer. And as outlined by the evidence gathered they actually did know. This was in fact, what is referred to as " a hail Mary pass". If we can excuse ( in part) even a rough outline of fraud ( which to my mind is doubtful), there's still the two other points to make, the one being of political interference both from the Canadian government and.directly by comments made by the former US President. The assumption that his influence is gone is superfluous. He was at the time, the legitimate executive therefore political interference DID happen. But even if the judge decides to sideline that argument, the departure of Standard Operating Procedure by the RCMP and comments and contradictory statements made by RCMP and CBSA officials has to my mind compromised this case. Not only that but as a result of handing confidential information to a foreign agency is an act that should have dire repercussions. 4 YB YB 4 hours ago You have to keep promoting this on different social medias - the US regime is blocking all forms of counter-narrative promotions - they block also a Fot Detrot petition link from being pasted 35 ken munro ken munro 3 hours ago It's time to Show some BACKBONE in Canada says this CANADIAN expert while apologizing TO Meng Wanzhou. 13 manifest 73 manifest 73 4 hours ago Don't let the US get away with this charade Canada. 18 Beware of the Leaven of the USA Beware of the Leaven of the USA 2 hours ago The real trial is that of the business ethics of HSBC bank and the Canada's justice and legal system. First, it has emerged that HSBC has not behaved honestly with a major client and shafted her in ordered to protect itself. Secondly, Canada judicial system has so far been tainted by politics and the case should have been thrown out months ago. It has no merits and the case against her has been tainted by politics. If she was extradited, infamy will forever blacken both HSBC and Canada. Trudeau will always be remembered as the weak PM who was a "useful fool" of its US master. HSBC has already shown itself incapable of acting honestly towards its client so it's uncertain if it can ever recover. 5 Moa Aier Moa Aier 4 hours ago (edited) Canadian law and claims of "rule of the law" can never ever be trusted if they carry out the US illegal demand. Canada has already damaged itself with the wrongful arrest. I pray it does no further or permanent damage by wrongfully extraditing her. She deserves to be freed immediately. I hope God grants wisdom to the judges to do the right thing and to do it expeditiously. 35 phildazz phildazz 3 hours ago Who gave the USA the rights to decide what business China and Iran can conduct or not to conduct? Who gave the Canadian government the right to implement American sanction Laws on other sovereign countries? That's the question the whole world should be addressing.Is, is USA sanction Laws represents international Laws? 40